It agrees to detach that it is not wanted to deny such theories, but to evidence conscientious intentions of remission through the acts of repentances that finish for implying, therefore, in the interrelation cruelty/benevolence. The illusions or imaginations printed for the author in the personality of its personages, on what they could have been, or on what they must not have been, confer to these, auto-inflicted disillusionments that make exactly with that they look for to act in different way and thus they search to draw a diverse picture of they themselves, that for this have that to confer itself pains and sufferings. Thus Pink Guimares demonstrates that it always has a change possibility, to start to make a different type of choice being disclosed that we have the power of transforming in them indefinitely and conscientious form, with intentions and objectives without however, to have that to use ' ' inconsciente' ' as excuse for our behavior. When somebody needs to be admired by its repentance, as Mutema, it is conscientious the sufficient one to know to identify themselves and if to define for the ends that it searchs. Also, when it is wanted to redeem itself of something as Matraga, known ' ' Censor' ' or ' ' Superego' ' of Freud it must be conscientious in it to know what to restrain.
Same in the frustration that suffers, the Marmela Mule knows that it is who if she disappoints, from there autocondena with sacrifices. Therefore, to if knowing that a person is essentially a unit, and not only an accumulation of desires or habits without relation, also knows that an essential choice for a paper or plan of life exists for each intention that of the o meant of any specific aspect of its behavior. Finally, as much a cruel behavior or autocruel can present feio of benevolence, how much a benignancy can stifle a pulso of ferocity.