It would explain that the group of the Ejido the villagers regardless of the characteristics of its members, redefines the course of action, the normative conduct in that context, based on the relations that maintains with the other group the immigrants. The social movement of the Ejido is characterized for being a movement not formally organized, in which their actors conduct collective battles, characterized by a high degree of internal solidarity and defense of their interests, and with an idea shared with reference to the paper of the Moroccan immigrants in its standard society: the immigrant like individual stranger, pertaining to a culture different from hers and carrier of values and beliefs that put in danger, threaten, the continuity of his culture and his identity. Starting off of the Interaccionista/Construccionista perspective, it would be the Construccionista, the one that could explain this movement, when emphasizing the importance of the meaning that the social actors attribute to the social structures. For this perspective, each aspect of the collective action is understood like a process interactive, defined symbolically and negotiated between participants. According to this perspective, in a context which the traditional normative structure enters conflict with a situation that evolves quickly, arise new normative definitions from fast way and continuous, new definitions arise. When the meaning available does not provide a base that is sufficient for the social action, they are going away to give emergencia of new social norms that define the unjust situation as and provide justification to the collective action.
The collective action is going away to see like a moved away of the pre-established social definitions and located activity in the outside of the cultural norms and the social relations standard. Following this perspective, the origin of the social movements is going to be a situation of conflict between systems of opposite or antagonistic values, as well as between groups within the social system, as it is the case of the Ejido. The emergent social movement in the Ejido is a social movement that is developed because a dissatisfaction feeling has extended, and is not a valid answer of the institutions, by not being sufficiently flexible, and are understood by the group of the incapable villagers like responding the same. It is understood then that what happened in the Ejido, was fruit of the result of a process interactive, defined symbolically, and negotiated between his participants, opponents and spectators. The concept of framing or fits is applicable to explain the phenomena and processes that are delimited by the meaning shared, as well as by its meaning inside the frame, that allows to the movement arisen the identification from causes, of the problems against which its action goes, as well as the definition of the possible solutions. Also, the own frame defines the actors of the social movement and stimulates the motivation for the participation in the movement. He is excellent, like we have explained previously, the consideration of the group Identity, that allows to distinguish between endogrupo, that is to say, the members of the own group, and exogrupo, that is to say, that does not belong to him.