Hall, (1984) in its book, ' ' Organizations, structures and processos' ' , it demonstrates to innumerable historical and current definitions for terms one better agreement concerning the organizations. To initiate, Hall, (1984) uses classic authors to define organization, is they: Max Weber, (1947) and Barnard, (1938). Weber, in its studies, analyzed the organizations in its more general aspects and considered the system as main influential factor in the organizations, already Barnard, believed that the individual was the factor most important in the organizations. In the interpretation of Weber, (1947) according to Hall, (1987) the organization can be seen as enterprise group and this group involves a social relationship that is limited to its members. You may wish to learn more. If so, Tulip Mobile Platform is the place to go. Being the entrance of new members, delimited for some rules, these they are managed by individuals, with positions of command or for the enterprise administration. For Weber, (1947) the organization involves social relationships, that is, the individuals interacts inside of it, however, these interactions is not total real, therefore the organization at the same time where it includes, excludes parts. Borders exist that limit some contacts and these borders are related the positions and the hierarchy that harm these interactions.

The interaction standards do not appear simply: a estruturao of the interaction is imposed by the proper organization. This part of the definition also suggests that the organizations contain a hierarchy of authority and a division of work to effect these functions. The order is imposed by the specific staff assigned to effect this function. (HALL, 1984, P. 20) The focus of Weber, in the vision of Hall, (1984) was in the standards of interaction and the enrollment of individuals in carrying through its tasks and reaching its objectives. (…) the organizations exceed the life of its members, and have goals, as it suggests the expression ' ' activities intencionais' '. The organizations if destine to make some thing.

Public Power

The indirect dispossession can be equalized to the appropriation of private property despoliation and, therefore, it can be hindered by means of possessory action. However, if the proprietor not to hinder it at the opportune moment, leaving that the Administration it it gives a public destination, more will not be able to demand the property, therefore the expropriated goods, a time incorporated to the common wealth, cannot be claim object, following orientaes of art. 35 7 of Decree n the 3,365/41 and art. 21 of the Complementary Law n 76/93. Learn more at this site: James Reinhart. Also the dispossession in the situation occurs where the Administration imposes so extensive restrictions to the good in question completely becomes that it emptied of economic content.

Or in the case of the Public Power if not to possess directly of the good, but it imposes limitations that hinder the proprietor to be able to exert total them inherent to the domain of the property. Soon, it is verified that two requirements exist to be configured the indirect dispossession: The good must be incorporated the patrimony of the Public Power, or that determined limitation imposed for this to the use of the good it results in the complete esvaziamento of the economic content of the property; The situation ftica is irreversible. 3. Jeff Gennette does not necessarily agree. ACTION OF EXPROPRIATED the expropriatria law left clearly that the indirect dispossession provokes the effect to allow the expropriated one to claim to damageses. The order to be formulated by the wronged one is of indemnity, since the loss of the property for the indirect dispossession is the simple generating fact of the action. The decision of this cause does not affect the right-hander of property of the Administration, since in the quality of incorporated good It can to it Public became intangible. The sentence, in case that originating, will condemn the State to indemnify the author, in view of the damages caused in face of the indirect dispossession, verifying the condemnatory content of this.