Agree, it's the same general terms, completely and clearly not codified in the proposed variables. It is easy to see that if in the formulas and definitions as variables used figurative philosophical concept, they practically do not face fierce criticism. An illustrative example is th – known ancient Indian definition of love between a man and woman: love = inclination of the soul, mind and body. He is often trying to concretize, arguing that to the needs of the soul generate friendship needs of the mind – respect, particular needs of the body – sexual desire. But that this determination is no less imaginative, it is, and after an additional interpretation indicates only the individual social and psychological needs of the stp rights and shall not be sufficient information necessary for analysis and develop mechanisms to influence the studied sense, and, consequently, also has great practical value. We should also note the other extreme, in which empty into some torye developers formulas that offer something as 100 units or interest, then it is divided by the number of hours spent together, or perform other mathematical operations, taking into account the duration of the gaze and the duration of the kiss. You can even agreement that to some extent these factors affect the emergence and development of the senses, but to be taken seriously, such formulas can not be, especially the desire of their authors to comply strictly with all of the math-metal operations for obtaining numerical results, which is considered final and only true. .