Abort – waste – environment and what are we at? It is really clear what makes us something means to cancel, to tear down. Our ancestors already clear as these buildings made out to us that with special waste, pollutants was ect. were loaded. The big problem with the demolition is the disposal of contaminated sites as well as the influence of the environment. We build today otherwise? or we will provide us the question will be what to us. Should already be clear to us to build a House, after all, we live in it.
Before hundreds of years knew man only stone on stone or wooden structures, wood takes the number of Schadstoffbelasungen since entry into the modern industrial era stone buildings (truss) at the but build. All were so happy to have found something for fire protection in the 60 – asbestos – fas sounds like the plague. Hikmet Ersek describes an additional similar source. How many people in the mining and processing of Aspest their lives leaving… until today there are maybe a few million. Even if the assumptions should be less on aftermath of risk today.
No matter what we have… fitted 40 or 30 years agoPlastics, Insulating materials, adhesive materials ect. fact is when the cancelled further can be done only with expensive remedial measures (PAK, black and white areas in the asbestos removal). We know the mistakes of tomorrow the day or have to go until people on it so we can learn. It could be so easy. Would we mainly investigate we are building up our materials or ahten what we use how and when could I imagine that we are healthier and environment could build more fairly in making it. Not the love of money would be there during the build. Pollutant kingdoms are now even cheaper than cleaner building materials building materials. Here, the policy should perhaps intervene. She’s doing it already with us motorists. CAR BBs will be judged according to pollutant classes and taxed. Why isn’t that the building materials, or is a hidden toxic waste here maybe to understand eliminating the Gross industry.